posted on: 5/11/2006
revised: 3/8/2010
The financial industry exploited the term "financial planning"
to the point where, by the end of the 1980s, it seemed that every sales person in
the financial industry printed this on their business cards and
letterhead. Large firms
like Merrill Lynch and the major mortgage brokers drew public
attention for the improper implications to consumers. It took
several years for the NASD to finally issue
a rule to control the use of the term "financial planning".
The rule that says that sales firms like brokers, life insurance
companies and banks must now disclose that any financial planning advice they may provide is only
incidental to their primary purpose of selling financial products.
Within the next decade even the CPA firms used this disclosure
standard to adapt financial product sales as a source of additional
revenue.
Some advisers, myself included, started
using the term "wealth adviser" years ago to imply that the service
we provided was more than about investments, money and transactions
but rather a lifestyle enhancement process. The change in
terminology also highlights the difference between an adviser
working in an independent fiduciary role in contrast to advice that
is incidental to a product sale.
This morning two contrasting e-mails
came to my in-box that drew my attention and ire:
From Financial-Planning.com (where I
serve as volunteer discussion moderator) -
"The affluent no longer think of
wealth in terms of net worth. Baby boomers changed all that. They
see wealth as a means, not an end--a means of achieving what they
want out of life.
For them, investment strategies are
hardly enough. They want advice on all their complex, interrelated
life goals and events, like career and business transitions, special
medical needs, philanthropy, major lifestyle changes and family
issues around managing wealth. Boomers want insight into all aspects
of their situation--personal as well as financial. They want control
over decisions without having to do all of the research themselves.
They want someone they trust to pull together the necessary
resources and expertise and offer them advice based on a deep
understanding of their goals, dreams and concerns.
That's what they want. But it's not
what they're getting."
and then a much different message from U.S. Wealth Management -
"Subject: Average production per
Advisor that far exceeds the industry average
...ATTN: Financial Advisors and
Planners!
Sometimes the grass is greener on the other side!
U. S. Wealth Management, LLC is the winning solution
to the following two challenges:
1) You are currently under-whelmed with the results of your
financial planning practice and are investigating new firms to help
"raise the bar" "...
So now we might expect hordes of
salespeople to reprint their business cards to include the term
"wealth management". I felt my stomach turn just reading this.
They just don't get it, yet we should not be surprised. The
economic force to push financial product sales are powerful beyond
consumer realization. While there are a growing number of advisers
who work in a fiduciary role, this tend to be limited to the very
wealthy clients. The vast majority of consumers who need ongoing
financial management and advice may never actually meet a adviser
who can say unequivocally "It's all about the advice and not about
product sales".
keywords: wealth management, financial
planning, NASD, fiduciary
related topics:
Copyright 2010 by Tony Novak. Originally produced and published for the "AskTony" column syndication prior to 2007. Edited and independently republished by the author in March 2010. All rights reserved. |