Editorials at   TonyNovak.com

editorials, reflections, half-developed ideas, comments and other uncategorized content

 

 

Editorial Policy

This Web log is presented for  entertainment use only.  These pages are not meant to provide advice or to be relied upon for any other purpose. 

 

For free public professional advice columns, see the AskTony forum.

 

 

Your comments and feedback are welcome.   Please indicate the topic you are commenting on in the subject field.


 

Regulating Tax Preparers

posted on:  5/16/2006     revised: 3/10/2010

 

Most of the nation's tax returns are prepared by paid professionals but reglators think that the term "professional" is used too loosely here. The majority of the estimated 1.5 million tax preparers in the U.S. have little or no training in law or accounting and are not regulated by any governmental or industry body.

A recent General Accounting Office report listed "serious concerns" about the accuracy and quality of tax returns by paid preparers at national tax-preparation chains.  Congress appears ready to take action, possibly by requiring additional training and holding firm principals accountable for errors by their employees.

Almost anybody can become a tax preparer with a big firm like H.R. Block, for example, by signing up and attending a training program. There are no degree requirements, no industry experience requirements and no continuing education requirements for tax preparers.

Complicating the problem is the fact that the large firms use the tax preparers as front line "client information gatherers" to be used for the purpose of marketing other financial products after they have all of the customer's financial information on file. In recent years the highest profits have come from selling customers high interest refund anticipation loans.

A law that imposes additional regulation of tax preparers seems like a good idea, but the real responsibility rests with the consumer. Most people who use a tax preparer to understate tax liability are well aware of the misrepresentation.  The number of tax preparers that deliberately give bad advice is probably as low as the number of "bad apples" in any line of work (I would not not call it a profession).

Those who call themselves "tax advisers" should have substantially more training in both law and accounting than a tax return preparer. It would not be difficult to argue, for example, that the majority of CPAs and attorneys are not well-versed in tax law and procedures and not qualified to give tax advice. Major financial publications like Money Magazine and the Wall Street Journal have shown that the odds of receiving the most appropriate response to a tax question are less than 50% when posed to any group of professionals. Rarely would two professionals come up with the same amount of tax due if preparing a return for an individual with complicating issues. Still, I believe that consumers who need tax advice should look for an attorney with the designation "LLM" or a CPA with the additional designation "MT". That designation means that the individual has spent the equivalent of two additional years of study specifically in the area of taxation. So when an LLM or an MT happens to give bad tax advice, at least we know that it is the best bad advice that money can buy!

 

keywords:   Tax adviser, preparer

 

related topics:

 

 


Copyright 2010 by Tony Novak. Originally produced and published for the "AskTony" column syndication prior to 2007. Edited and independently republished by the author in March 2010. All rights reserved.