New strategies for reducing health care costs

Posted on Posted in HTML Import

Tony Novak online accountantQuickBooks Certified ProAdvisorNovak Online Tax & Acounting
Tony Novak, CPA, MBA, MT
(610) 572-1724   onlineadviser@live.com

View Tony Novak, CPA, MBA, MT's profile on LinkedIn

Save time and money working with an online accountant

New strategies for reducing business health care costs

by Tony Novak, CPA, MBA, MT
, revised 11/29/2011

Employers of all sizes nationwide share a common battle to reduce health plan price increases through active negotiation and redesign of their insurance plans. Of the companies surveyed by a benefits consulting firm in 2003, the average original proposed health plan price increase was 17.7%. After negotiations, the average increase was 11.5%. Savings were realized on prescription drug plans, higher deductibles and office visit co-payments. Health insurance companies are more willing to negotiate with employers now because health cost inflation has not been as high as high as expected in recent years.

One high profile example is the California Public Employees Retirement System (CALPERS) that originally faced an overall 31% premium increase from California Blue Shield and Kaiser Permanente. After re-examining their plans, the increase was reduced to 16.4% and 18% respectively.

The original survey was published by Hewitt Associates, a leading provider of consulting services to the large firms. Since then,  many other benefits consultants have reported similar experiences. Smaller businesses may not have access to a professional benefits consultant, but the same principles may apply to reduce health care cost increases.  Employers can reduce costs by redesigning benefit plans with more cost-effective features. Certain health plans specifically designed to cut costs for smaller firms like Health Savings Accounts (HSA) and Health Reimbursement Arrangements (HRA) may result in larger savings than were achieved by the larger employers in the Hewitt survey. By eliminating the administrative cost component of processing minor claims, smaller firms can renegotiate cost increases to minimal levels.

Status: outdated but available for reprint

These strategies were ‘new’ at the time of original publication but are generally considered ‘worn out’ by 2011 at republication.

This article is available for republication in its entirety without charge after obtaining the express written permission of the author.

Pleasee-mail a request to the author that includes the name of the requestor (individual and corporate) and the intended destination of publication.


tonynovak.comThis Web site is independently owned and operated by Tony Novak operating under the trademarks “Freedom Benefits”, “OnlineAdviser” and “OnlineNavigator”. Opinions expressed are the sole responsibility of the author and do not represent the opinion of any other person, company or entity mentioned. Tony Novak is not a representative, agent, broker, producer or navigator for any securities broker dealer firm, federal or state health insurance marketplace or qualified health plan carrier and has no financial position in any stocks mentioned. Novak may act as and be compensated as an accountant, agent, adviser, writer, consultant, marketer, reviewer, endorser, producer, lead generator or referrer to the companies listed on this site or other commercial companies and non-governmental insurance exchanges. Information is from sources believed to be reliable but cannot be guaranteed. Any accounting, business or tax advice contained in this communication, including attachments and enclosures, is not intended as a thorough, in-depth analysis of specific issues or a substitute for a formal opinion, nor is it sufficient to avoid tax-related penalties.

141 Jones Street, Bala Cynwyd PA 19004   |   P.O. Box 333, Newport NJ 08345

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *